In the Money: 5 Things to Know

The Optimistic Regulator: Canada’s Banks Are Strong — But Here’s What Keeps Regulators Up at Night

March 17, 2026
Canada’s banking system is often described as one of the strongest in the world — but even strong systems face real risks. Peter Routledge, Superintendent of Financial Institutions, joins In the Money with Amber Kanwar for a rare conversation about the health of Canada’s financial system and what still keeps the country’s top banking regulator up at night.
Here are the main takeaways: 
1. Private Credit and Non-Bank Financial Intermediaries Pose Escalating but Manageable Risks
Routledge identified exposures to non-bank financial intermediaries (NBFIs), including private credit and private equity funds, as a priority in OSFI’s upcoming Annual Risk Outlook, due to rapid growth and linkages to regulated banks.

  • Banks face counterparty risks through lending, derivatives, and other transactions with these lightly regulated entities, which have expanded post-financial crisis (partly from stricter bank rules).
  • Growth exceeding ~15% year-over-year in some players signals potential for more distress events (“cockroaches” in industry terms), as seen in recent media reports, though no evidence points to systemic toxicity.
  • OSFI is scrutinizing untested concentrations, liquidity/collateral issues in stress scenarios, and NBFI roles in sovereign bond markets (where leverage could amplify volatility during unwinds).

2. Stress Tests (B-20 Guideline) Remain Essential for System Resilience Despite Affordability Criticism
Routledge staunchly defended the mortgage stress test (qualifying at contract rate +2% for uninsured mortgages), citing data showing it reduces defaults and prepares the system for rate shocks, even as critics argue it hinders homeownership.

  • Empirical evidence (including Bank of Canada studies) links the test to lower credit losses over cycles by encouraging prudent borrowing/lending; delinquencies stay near historic lows despite recent economic pressures.
  • It prevents excessive risk buildup in credit-fueled housing markets and curbs boom-bust cycles; no major banks have requested its removal, as it levels the playing field and prevents competitive weakening of standards.
  • Tools like the loan-to-income (LTI) portfolio limit (capping high-debt mortgages at ~20-25% of originations) complement the stress test by addressing gaps (e.g., during low-rate booms with variable-rate products), promoting safer overall underwriting.

3. Increasing Competition in Canadian Banking Through Regulatory Modernization
Routledge is driving efforts to boost competitiveness and innovation in Canada’s banking sector, aiming to attract new entrants (fintechs, credit unions) while keeping innovation within the regulated system to mitigate future risks.

  • OSFI is slashing new bank licensing timelines from ~36 months to ~12 months by streamlining processes, reducing iterative “consulting,” and adopting phased approvals with initial low-risk constraints (e.g., starting with insured mortgages).
  • A wave of new entrants is anticipated in 2026, following recent successes (e.g., Questrade) and the formal updated application process launching in June 2026.
  • This fits a broader “regulatory reboot” balancing resilience and growth; post-2023 global shocks highlighted the system’s strength (ample buffers, no failures since 1996), shifting focus toward enabling economic support without excessive caution.

Don’t miss our next episode! 

DISCLAIMERS: This text AI generated and should be checked against actual delivery. The content provided in this podcast is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or professional advice. The views expressed by the host and guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of any organization or company. The host and guests may maintain positions in any securities discussed on the podcast. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor or professional before making any investment decisions.

Leave a Reply